rain_and_snow: (Default)
rain_and_snow ([personal profile] rain_and_snow) wrote2010-04-02 11:20 pm

(no subject)

And this isn't even a funded anti-drug ad.
But it's probably more effective than they are.
I think the key is that it skips the "that won't happen to me" because it's not about "me".



ext_36836: (Default)

[identity profile] connikins.livejournal.com 2010-04-02 12:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Well if drugs were legalised then arguably the ethics of them would go up since it wouldn't be funding organised crime.

[identity profile] rain-and-snow.livejournal.com 2010-04-02 12:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I absolutely agree. The preceding segment was a pretty good one on 'police against drug laws'. In that, they should be legalised because prohibition DOESN'T WORK.

^_^

I just liked that this was far more successful at convincing me to avoid MDMA than the dirty toilet ads by the government were.